why the allByDefault declaration is marked as an e...

# getting-started

[febs]

why the allByDefault declaration is marked as an error while the declaration of simple is not? This is the official documentation.

[Pavlo Liapota]

It would be an error for a simple too, as comment says:

must be initialized in constructor

[febs]

OK, thanks, that was unclear. To me it looked like "the first example is an error, period. In the second case you can initialize it in the constructor"