Makes sense, the interfaces really are defined in ...
# getting-started
k
Makes sense, the interfaces really are defined in common, but the classes are all
expect
.
i
The classes are declared in JS part and all are
external
, i.e. provided by JS platform.
k
Yup, makes sense.
It's still surprising that the common code shows up on the JVM at all, since I don't think it's ever useful?
Actually are the .class files from that package included in every JVM project too?
i
In JVM classes in the same package come from JDK, I'm not sure they are structurally same, we haven't made an effort to provide common declarations for them.
b
oh so you tell me that I am using the JDK when I do that? I was wondering why the interface was so bad 🙂