Makes sense, the interfaces really are defined in common, but the classes are all `expect`.

# getting-started

[karelpeeters]

Makes sense, the interfaces really are defined in common, but the classes are all expect.

[ilya.gorbunov]

The classes are declared in JS part and all are external, i.e. provided by JS platform.

[karelpeeters]

Yup, makes sense.

[karelpeeters]

It's still surprising that the common code shows up on the JVM at all, since I don't think it's ever useful?

[karelpeeters]

Actually are the .class files from that package included in every JVM project too?

[ilya.gorbunov]

In JVM classes in the same package come from JDK, I'm not sure they are structurally same, we haven't made an effort to provide common declarations for them.

[bjonnh]

oh so you tell me that I am using the JDK when I do that? I was wondering why the interface was so bad 🙂