albeit slower test runs, but you would get more co...
# rxz
zak.taccardi
03/21/2017, 11:23 PMalbeit slower test runs, but you would get more code coverage
g
grandstaish
03/21/2017, 11:26 PMI'll reply here because it's kinda off the rx topic. But yeah, I'm on the fence. I like my espresso tests because it covers everything, but espresso isn't without issues. It is slower, and I have issues with RecyclerView pretty often too. Additionally I've never seen a reliable way of disabling animations on a device, other than manually doing it. So yeah, sometimes I wonder if jvm/robolectric tests would be better suited.
z
zak.taccardi
03/21/2017, 11:27 PMwell, I'd never do robolectric for UI test because they're UI layer is completely faked
zak.taccardi
03/21/2017, 11:27 PMhave you tried firebase cloud test lab?
g
grandstaish
03/21/2017, 11:28 PMno, neither. but im pretty sure i have some android references mixed around parts of my code. Things like TextUtils.isEmpty, for example
grandstaish
03/21/2017, 11:28 PMhaven't tried that yet
z
zak.taccardi
03/21/2017, 11:29 PMoh man, I do not miss java's static methods haha
g
grandstaish
03/21/2017, 11:30 PMi still use java day to day 😔 there aren't many companies in new zealand using kotlin yet
2 Views