A modern programming language that makes developers happier.

kotlinlang

Should it really behave like that?
```@Test fun shouldBlowYourMind() {
    Observable.empty&lt;Unit&gt;().test().assertEmpty()
}```
`java.lang.AssertionError: Completed! (latch = 0, values = 0, errors = 0, completions = 1)`

karolkowalski: Looks like a bug or incomplete documentation

```
public final U assertEmpty() {
        return assertSubscribed()
                .assertNoValues()
                .assertNoErrors()
                .assertNotComplete();
    }
```

File an issue I guess, either javadoc or `assertNotComplete()` should be fixed

In the javadocs for assertEmpty() says "Assert that the TestObserver/TestSubscriber/TestSubscriber has received a Disposable but no other events."

And it is receiving a Complete Event, so it's being consistent with the documentation

Well, it’s still kinda strange to have method named `assertEmpty()` that fails on `Observable.empty()`

Well, I agree that the name could lead to confusion. Maybe a rename to `assertNoEvents()` could avoid confusion