if we have set/get operator on not nullable elemen...

# language-proposals

[elect]

if we have set/get operator on not nullable elements (!!) we shall also have it after .?

[karelpeeters]

Can you give an example of what you mean?

[elect]

array!![0] and array?.get(0)

[Fudge]

This is different because array!! is an expression and array? is not. You can visualize it by putting parentheses
(array!!)[0] vs (array?)[0] or (array?.)[0]

Not to say it’s impossible to special case that, other languages have done it

[karelpeeters]

Here's an issue: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-24603