+1 to <@U0F8Y5E5A> . `varargs` with size seems pre...

# language-proposals

[cedric]

+1 to @mg6maciej . varargs with size seems pretty obscure for deserving a language construct. Leave that at runtime.

[groostav]

cedric: I mean, if you look at it as the standard parser ops, we've got the optional operator a? in the form of "defaulted" arguments. We've got the kleen closure a* with vararg, it seems to me to be a natural extension to ask for the one-or-more a+ operator.

[cedric]

@groos I think likening the ? for nullable types to the quantity operator used in regexp is a bit of a stretch

[groostav]

I didnt mean nullable values are optional ones, I meant defaulted ones are optional ones