It is time to pay tribute to Rx and to Reactive Streams and to explore their relation to Kotlin Flow...

# feed

[elizarov]

It is time to pay tribute to Rx and to Reactive Streams and to explore their relation to Kotlin Flows https://medium.com/@elizarov/reactive-streams-and-kotlin-flows-bfd12772cda4

[Pavlo Liapota]

…and on its history Viktor Klang had published a great account³.

Published an account?

Great article as always!

[elizarov]

I think his account of those events is great. Can’t I use the adjective here?

[Mike]

I would go with Viktor Klang published a great account. Published is already past-tense, so no need for ‘had’. I don’t see an issue with great given that you think it’s more than just an account, and want to make that clear.

[Mike]

Do you want an analysis of grammar?

I see several other things, but only if you actually want to see them. And if you’d prefer a DM for that, let me know.

For example, I’d replace the above with ‘Reactive Streams initiative, and Viktor Klang published a great article on its history’. Assuming it was an article. blog post, paper, …

[elizarov]

I do want, please DM

[elizarov]

(You can also leave private notes on medium — they are great because they are tied to a specific piece of text and thus work as a tool to discuss grammar or other potential corrections)

[kevin.cianfarini]

For anyone who didn't quite understand backpressure (like me) and needed it explained in simple terms, I enjoyed this video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5wkSN6FRsM▾

[Czar]

@elizarov FYI

[elizarov]

Know that, studied that. There’s nothing we can do about. Stupid medium. I’ll move out of medium one day. Don’t have time and resource at the moment.