Is there a reason why Exposed is (still) using jod...

# exposed

[danielm]

Is there a reason why Exposed is (still) using joda-time?

[lex]

for jdk 1.6 compatibility, I think

[oshai]

I know its being reworked to allow you to pick implementation

[spand]

Is it in progress ?

[danielm]

Would be interesting to see the usage of pre-1.8 and 1.8+ 😉

[tapac]

Yep, it's on our roadmap. We want to allow to choose among joda/java.time/java.time-backport with just changing the dependency, but before that we plan to split Exposed to core+dialects jars and make it modular and extendable

[spand]

Is it in progress ? or "just" on the roadmap ?

[tapac]

I have prototype imlementation of such refactoring.