A modern programming language that makes developers happier.

kotlinlang

```
vbox {
  add(SubViewA::class)
  add(SubViewB::class)
  add(SubViewC::class)
  add(SubViewD::class)
}
```
Assuming `SubViewX` is a `Fragment`

That TornadoFX is made for (short code) :smiley:

I realized it could also be written as
vbox {
 add&lt;SubViewA&gt;()
 add&lt;SubViewB&gt;()
 add&lt;SubViewC&gt;()
 add&lt;SubViewD&gt;()
}
Is there any differences? Is the one better/more correct than the other, or is it more personal style?

E.g. `find&lt;MyFragment&gt;()` can be used to pass parameters to the fragment like `find&lt;MyFragment&gt;(mapOf(MyFragment::myPropert1 to value1, MyFragment::myProperty2 to value2))`

In the case without parameters, I think, it's a matter of taste

The new and preferred syntax is add&lt;SubViewA&gt;() :slightly_smiling_face:

Thanks! Is there a way to add scope to this? Let's say I'm adding the same fragment multiple times, but want different scopes for the fragments? Or am I doing it wrong then?

Yes, the new syntax accepts scopes as parameter, so you can do `add&lt;SubViewA&gt;(Scope())` to create a new scope on the fly.

Oh, and yes that's a very reasonable way of doing it.

Interesting... Is it faster? Or just 'cause of opportunity of adding parameters?

It was added because it's a nicer syntax. We could have added parameters to the old syntax as well, but the old syntax should be removed in 2.0, so no need :slightly_smiling_face: