<https://www.itworld.com/article/3261066/java/java...
# tornadofx
r
Is there an actual source for that claim? That article doesn't seem to have any.
I'm not saying it's false, just that it doesn't seem corroborated.
j
Agree, I looked and couldn't find... I honestly don't see it as that big of a deal... I'm in love with/addicted to jOOQ and it's not in the JDK/JRE 🙂 I'm sticking with JavaFX...
Just thought it might be of interest here... but didn't mean it as a "negative"...
r
Indeed, it's just a strange article
j
This one references a "white paper" and has several "quotes"... but can't find anything official... https://sdtimes.com/java/javafx-now-available-separate-module/
r
Same here
j
thank you very much
r
Good find
e
This might end up being a good thing actually. I think it has been clear for years that Oracle doesn’t care about JavaFX, but if it’s decoupled and open source we could really take it where we want, even reimplement parts of it in Kotlin and get rid of bugs and weird behavior :)
👍 1
r
Very true
h
... Starting with JDK 11...
that's quite a long way in future
a
@hoang Actually no. 11 targeted GA is September 2018
h
wow, didn't even notice Java 9 has released
a
JDK 10 GA is targeted for March 20
e
It's a new major version every 6 months now 🙂