Currently, when using `flow.produceIn(aScope)`, if...

# coroutines

[tseisel]

Currently, when using flow.produceIn(aScope), if the source flow terminates with an exception then the produce coroutines fails and cancels the scope and its parent. Wouldn't it be better if it only cancelled the resulting ReceiveChannel ?

[bdawg.io]

That's the contract if structured concurrency. If you don't want it to cancel the parent, consider passing a SupervisorScope instead