is it possible to solve exactly this issue with coroutines in elegant way? <https://stackoverflow.co...

# coroutines

[deviant]

is it possible to solve exactly this issue with coroutines in elegant way?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12450402/java-synchronizing-based-on-a-parameter-named-mutex-lock

[alllex]

You can try storing `Mutex`es (which is a non-blocking version of locks) in a map as well. But maybe make sure you use an appropriate ConcurrentHashMap to store them and get them via thread-safe computeIfAbsent to create new mutexes.