Frankly, I'm wondering if `GlobalScope` should not be made experimental with something like `@WhyGlo...

# coroutines

[louiscad]

Frankly, I'm wondering if GlobalScope should not be made experimental with something like @WhyGlobalThingsAreBad with some details on that special coroutines case of structured concurrency that should not be broken…

[ghedeon]

That will give you false negative alarm when using GlobalScope with Rx

[itnoles]

it should not uses on Android

[ghedeon]

sorry, but I'd rather trust the guy who invented it and who says that using GlobalScope with rx types is totally fine.

https://kotlinlang.slack.com/archives/C1CFAFJSK/p1548857935692300?thread_ts=1548856043.691400&cid=C1CFAFJSK

[louiscad]

Then, name it @BreakingStructuredConcurrency or whatever, and for cases like this, just add the annotation at use site with @UseExperimental, or on the module.

[Paulius Ruminas]

But it is not an experimental feature so that would be even more confusing? Maybe there should be a lint rule in android studio?

[louiscad]

Coroutines are not Android only, so it should be an IDE inspection rather than a lint rule if it had to go that way. Or lint should be made more lightweight so it doesn't bloat build with lint check of non Android projects/modules

[Paulius Ruminas]

I think it would produce a lot of false positives if it would be made as IDE inspection for every platform.

[louiscad]

Lint would too. I prefer experimental annotations for this kind of thing though, because you can opt-in for a whole file, or a whole module.