My Thoughts: • Anvil is less opinionated than Hilt • Customizing the component per source tree is simpler in anvil ◦ the “replaces” feature in hilt is limited to the testing environment ◦ anvil allows replacement in the regular (non test) code • Anvil lacks injection support • The default components in Hilt don’t support @BindsInstance • Testing in Hilt is very intrusive ◦ requires certain annotations ◦ requires a custom test runner ◦ pushing mocks into the graph is a little hokey

I haven’t made a decision yet, but the big thing hilt has going for it is the assisted injection. But i also need to try to build my .aar file and bring it into another hilt project and see if it properly combines the graphs (it should, but i’d like to verify)