In traditional MVVM, what do you guys consider you...
# android-architecturer
rkeazor
05/28/2020, 4:52 PMIn traditional MVVM, what do you guys consider your model(ie your networking layer) ?
h
henrikhorbovyi
05/28/2020, 5:04 PMI consider everything after domain (inclusive)
o
OG
05/29/2020, 3:45 AMTo be specific, I consider my repository/useCase class and everything it encapsulates (ie DAO, webservices/networking etc)
👍🏻 1
☝️ 1
k
KayCee
05/31/2020, 5:30 AMwhat is traditional MVVM, is it MVVM without clean architecture, D.I?
r
rkeazor
05/31/2020, 7:08 AMWithout clean architecture. im guessing.
rkeazor
05/31/2020, 7:08 AMDI is fine
rkeazor
05/31/2020, 7:08 AMclean architecture is a architecture of its own
k
KayCee
05/31/2020, 9:27 AMso in some cases, or some projects, we just need traditional MVVM?
r
rkeazor
05/31/2020, 3:21 PMI think MVVM, doesn't need clean architecture to be honest. The usecase model is cool and all , but its not needed to accomplish mvvm
rkeazor
05/31/2020, 3:22 PMDI. is just a good coding design principal to have regardless of the architecture
a
Andrew
06/02/2020, 8:02 PMIn MVVM the model is everything that isn't the UI, bit different definition than what most things mean when they say model
3 Views