Is there a more idiomatic way to nest Eithers? This is what I have. ```sourceA().handleErrorWith { ...

# arrow

[Jeff]

Is there a more idiomatic way to nest Eithers? This is what I have.

sourceA().handleErrorWith {
    sourceB().handleErrorWith {
        sourceC()
    }
}

[Joram Visser]

A more idiomatic way would be:

sourceA()
    .flatMap { sourceB() }
    .flatMap { sourceC() }

If you only want to invoke sourceB and sourceC in cases errors occurred, then I guess your approach is fine.

[Jeff]

Yeah I only want them as fallbacks. I wanted something like raceN but returning a left still cancels the others.

[Joram Visser]

I believe the handleErrorWith approach is pretty idiomatic for the use case you are describing.

[Joram Visser]

If you want to race and have a fallback, you could combine raceN and handleErrorWith. 🤔

[Jeff]

I’m not sure what you mean. I image something with a signature like raceN but is firstRight(a(), b(), c()).fold(onA, onB, onC)
Which wouldn’t cancel on a Left but would cancel on a Right and would return that Right.

[Joram Visser]

I don’t think such a function exists. You can always write it yourself. 😃

[simon.vergauwen]

@Jeff I propose just using something like swap on Either which swaps the side so you could do.

race({ eitherA().swap() }, { eitherB().swap() }).swap()

It's a bit tedious but for sure the easiest way to achieve your tasks without to much overhead since 3x swap is minimal compared to dispatching 3 times. (2 for launching tasks, and one again to return to original ctx).

[simon.vergauwen]

handleErrorWith is the correct way of chaining Left you can consider it flatMapLeft and thus you could also write a eitherLeft { } block for it if you'd want to.

[Joram Visser]

How is the swap going to help in this case? 😯 An error on the right might still win the race, right?

[simon.vergauwen]

Oh, I misunderstood the requirement.

[Joram Visser]

Race could be used in combination with something like keepRetryingSourceAUntilItYieldsARight(maxRetries)

[Joram Visser]

And same for sourceB and sourceC. The raceN would probably return the first one that yields a right.

[Joram Visser]

But not sure if this is a good fit for the system that’s being build.

[simon.vergauwen]

It'd be possible to write such a combinator from composition with other primitives but you need to do some state management I believe for the case where all result in Left.
This is a snippet I whipped together and should be thoroughly tested but basically, it just keeps track of how many task have finished and the first Left it encounters.
If all task run out without a Right winning the race than the first encountered Left will be returned rather than the last which marked the race as finsihed with all Left.
The first Right wins the race.
This is achieved by making Left suspend and thus not allowing them to complete the race

suspend fun <E, A> firstRight(fa: suspend () -> Either<E, A>, fb: suspend () -> Either<E, A>): Either<E, A> {
  var firstLeft: Atomic<Either<E, A>?> = Atomic(null)
  var finished: Atomic = Atomic(0)

  suspend fun Either<E, A>.suspendOnLeft(): Either<E, A> =
    when(this) {
       is Right -> this
       is Left -> when {
         finished.get() == 2 -> firstLeft.get()!!
         else -> {
           firstLeft.update { current -> if(current == null) this else current }
           finished.update(Int:inc)
           suspendCoroutine<A> { }
       }
    }

  return race({ fa().suspendOnLeft() }, { fb().suspendOnLeft() }) }
}

[simon.vergauwen]

if(firstLeft.get() != null) finished.update(Int::inc) else firstLeft.update { this }

This line needs to be rewritten to use modify on Atomic instead since this is not atomically sound

[simon.vergauwen]

I updated the snippet

[simon.vergauwen]

I think such an operator might be eligible for being added in Arrow Fx since working with suspend and Either is an important focus of Arrow