Looking to start adopting new `singleOf` in 3.2.0 release. Currently I have likes of following ```...

# koin

[John O'Reilly]

Looking to start adopting new singleOf in 3.2.0 release. Currently I have likes of following

single<PeopleInSpaceRepositoryInterface> { PeopleInSpaceRepository() }
    single { PeopleInSpaceApi(get()) }

PeopleInSpaceApi also has 2nd default param (url) which seems to cause an issue if I try following (error below). What's recommended way of dealing with this or is it better to use existing single for cases like this?.

singleOf<PeopleInSpaceRepositoryInterface>(::PeopleInSpaceRepository)
    singleOf(::PeopleInSpaceApi)

could not create instance for [Singleton:'com.surrus.common.remote.PeopleInSpaceApi']: org.koin.core.error.NoBeanDefFoundException: |- No definition found for class:'java.lang.String'. Check your definitions!

[arnaud.giuliani]

yes with default value in constructor, it will try to fill with get()

[arnaud.giuliani]

then your url is not passed. Either you can pass it as injected param

[arnaud.giuliani]

(or config object)

[John O'Reilly]

ok, thanks....will take a look at doing something like that

[wbertan]

@John O'Reilly your URL is of type String ? Wondering if can make use of a a proper type like data class ApiUrl(url: String) (not sure if Koin supports the value class 🤔), then you can actually provide the definition of an ApiUrl to Koin and the get would resolve it.
We've in our project something similar (even we are not using the singleOf, to make sure some things are given as it should (and TBH we also use some named in some cases to differentiate)