A modern programming language that makes developers happier.

kotlinlang

if you previously used `release()`to drop single definitions, better use now `scope` definition tied to the same scope Id

Is there an example for that case? I could not find one!

what we have right now is something like:

```
val someModule = module("A) {
   single { Foo() }
   single { Bar() }
   single { Qux() }
}
```
and then just `release("A")`

Not sure how I could do that with `scope` now

<@U2JKKPMEE> kind ping :slightly_smiling_face: Is there a way that the above is possible at all ?

Hey, just use it like below:
```
val someModule = module("A) {
   scope("A") { Foo() }
   scope("A") { Bar() }
   scope("A") { Qux() }
}
```
use the `createScope("A")`, inject or get Foo Bar
and close scope “A”

So my understanding is that "A" is not a unique identifier, more like a scope TAG correct? If so could you please specify that in the documentation? :stuck_out_tongue:

Cause it seemed to me that it is something unique!