if you previously used `release()`to drop single definitions, better use now `scope` definition tied...

# koin

[arnaud.giuliani]

if you previously used `release()`to drop single definitions, better use now scope definition tied to the same scope Id

[pavlospt]

Is there an example for that case? I could not find one!

[pavlospt]

what we have right now is something like:

val someModule = module("A) {
   single { Foo() }
   single { Bar() }
   single { Qux() }
}

and then just release("A")

[pavlospt]

Not sure how I could do that with scope now

[pavlospt]

@arnaud.giuliani kind ping 🙂 Is there a way that the above is possible at all ?

[arnaud.giuliani]

Hey, just use it like below:

val someModule = module("A) {
   scope("A") { Foo() }
   scope("A") { Bar() }
   scope("A") { Qux() }
}

use the createScope("A"), inject or get Foo Bar
and close scope “A”

[pavlospt]

So my understanding is that "A" is not a unique identifier, more like a scope TAG correct? If so could you please specify that in the documentation? 😛

[pavlospt]

Cause it seemed to me that it is something unique!