Well that is interesting ```/* In a module of a KM...

# serialization

[ribesg]

Well that is interesting

/* In a module of a KMP library */
@Serializable
internal data class GetFileResponse(
    val url: String
)

// In the same module
    override suspend fun getFileUrl(fileId: FileId): String =
        http.get<GetFileResponse>("$baseUrl$file/$fileId") {
            useAuthentication()
        }.url

/* In an iOS app using the aforementioned library */
        val url = try {
            fileApi.getFileUrl(fileId)
        } catch(t: Throwable) {
            log.error("Failed to get file url for file id $fileId: ${t.message}", t)
            return null
        }

/* Logs when running */
ERROR - Failed to get file url for file id blablabla: Fields [name, rating] are required for type with serial name 'whatever.whatever.internal.model.UpsertCandidateEvaluationPayload.CriteriaValue', but they were missing
kotlinx.serialization.MissingFieldException: Fields [name, rating] are required for type with serial name 'whatever.whatever.internal.model.UpsertCandidateEvaluationPayload.CriteriaValue', but they were missing

The model mentioned by the log is completely unrelated and defined in a completely different place in another dependency… wat

I just updated to 1.6.0 then 1.6.10 from 1.5.31 so maybe it’s that I don’t know. Super weird bug and not sure what to do. Is it some kind of name/id/hashcode clash or something?

[ribesg]

My current solution is to replace the call with that, but like, wtf

override suspend fun getFileUrl(fileId: FileId): String =
        http.get<JsonObject>("$baseUrl$file/$fileId") {
            useAuthentication()
        }.getValue("url").jsonPrimitive.content