I am happy to announce that 0.7.0 is out. Enjoy :g...
# atrium
r
I am happy to announce that 0.7.0 is out. Enjoy ๐Ÿ˜ Please take note of the migration guide at the end of the release notes: https://github.com/robstoll/atrium/releases/tag/v0.7.0
๐ŸŽ‰ 1
d
In jars can be found jn release notes it refers to rc2?
r
thanks, forgot to update the links in the release notes
d
Shouldn't it be toBeEmpty, toNotBeEmpty, and toHaveSize?
Since is null and is not null is being deprecated, why not be consistent? Also may be confusing with stdlib...
r
you mean instead of isEmpty`?
d
Yup
r
I'll think about it... I see what you mean. maybe something for 0.8.0
btw. release-notes are fixed now
d
I was a bit confused at first trying to distinguish assertions from other functions... I keep on having to look at all the funny types in code complete... ๐Ÿ™‚
But thanks for the nice library, it really comes in handy... ๐Ÿ˜ƒ
r
with funny types you mean:
Assert /* AssertionPlant */
?
I was thinking about making
Assert
the proper type and
AssertionPlant
a type alias. I for one do not like to see the
/* AssertionPlant */
all the time
d
Yup... I really think all those things are only for those who need their own grammar... 90% of users (i'd suppose), will stick to the default...
Also I think the docs could be more oriented for those not making their own grammar, the ones that do could have a seperate 'advanced' doc, it would be less scary for some...
r
good to know, thanks ๐Ÿ™‚ Do you have a concrete example where the docs are too cryptic?
d
At least, that's my opinion simple smile
r
It's a very valid opinion. Also note that I welcome pull requests improving KDoc ๐Ÿ™‚
@dave08 I created https://github.com/robstoll/atrium/issues/26 thanks for your Feedback. Please create another issue if you have further ideas how Atrium could be improved ๐Ÿ‘