<@U5UU34LPK>Yes, but you can't do that directly on...
# klaxonc
camdenorrb
08/01/2018, 1:10 AM@karelpeetersYes, but you can't do that directly on an object
k
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 1:11 AMWhat's that?
c
camdenorrb
08/01/2018, 1:11 AMWhat's what?
k
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 1:12 AMWhat can't you do on an object?
c
camdenorrb
08/01/2018, 1:12 AMMake it pretty print
camdenorrb
08/01/2018, 1:12 AMYou have to first convert it to a json object
camdenorrb
08/01/2018, 1:14 AMDo you see the issue?
k
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 1:14 AMAh is this about the conversation from two weeks ago?
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 1:14 AMMight have to give a bit of a reminder next time simple smile
c
camdenorrb
08/01/2018, 1:14 AMYeah
camdenorrb
08/01/2018, 1:15 AMcamdenorrb
08/01/2018, 1:15 AMHere is an issue on the topic
k
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 1:16 AMI don't really get the question, klaxon is a JSON library, hence it includes a feature to pretty print JSON. It also includes some stuff to convert instances to JSON.
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 1:16 AMIt it not a data-class-pretty-printing-as-json library.
c
camdenorrb
08/01/2018, 1:16 AMI didn't say it was
camdenorrb
08/01/2018, 1:16 AMI'm saying their implementation is silly, since you first have to serialize it just to parse it again then to serialize it again with pretty print
k
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 1:23 AMMy bad that is indeed weird.
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 1:24 AMThere's no way to convert an instance to a JsonObject directly?
c
camdenorrb
08/01/2018, 2:35 AMI don't believe so
k
karelpeeters
08/01/2018, 9:10 PMc
camdenorrb
08/02/2018, 3:28 AM@karelpeeters How?