diego-gomez-olvera09/22/2021, 12:39 PM
and refer to it with
, which is not type safe: In case of refactoring (e.g. rename or package change), the tests might break inadvertently. Is there a more type safe manner to mock extension functions?
Mattia Tommasone09/22/2021, 12:41 PM
which has indeed the problem that it is not safe towards class renaming, you’re right
diego-gomez-olvera09/22/2021, 1:03 PM
Justin Tullgren09/24/2021, 6:30 PM