Yes clear is suggested if you want to return back default be

Question

Yes clear is suggested if you want to return back default behavior otherwise next mockkStatic will clear it

darych · Answer

But if I add `clearMocks SecurityContext getAgentInfo ` to cleanup after each test I receive error ``` io mockk MockKException can t find stub aid=AGENT ID org=ORG ID sid=null at io mockk impl stub StubRepository stubFor StubRepository kt 15 at io mockk impl stub CommonClearer clear CommonClearer kt 16 at io mockk MockKKt clearMocks MockK kt 654 at io mockk MockKKt clearMocks$default MockK kt 227 ```

oleksiyp · Answer

clearStaticMockk SecurityContext class

oleksiyp · Answer

But thats out of my heas

oleksiyp · Answer

head

oleksiyp · Answer

You can untranform class at all after test by unmockkAll

darych · Answer

So the default behavior will be library s default

oleksiyp · Answer

But this may be more time consuming then clear

oleksiyp · Answer

By default static mocks act like spies

oleksiyp · Answer

So clear will just make all calls pass to original implementation

darych · Answer

Thanks will try

darych · Answer

Should I after `clearStaticMockk` run `mockkStatic ` again

darych · Answer

For some reason I still get old value from mock

oleksiyp · Answer

Not really but no harm penalty

oleksiyp · Answer

Ah maybe it is

oleksiyp · Answer

clearMockkStatic

oleksiyp · Answer

There is deorecated set of methoda there I do not remeber it out of my head

oleksiyp · Answer

Anyway if it is failing please report github issue

oleksiyp · Answer

And meanwhile use unmockkStatic or unmockkAll

darych · Answer

Ok thank you will create small repro case

darych · Answer

< oleksiyp> I debugged code little bit Could static function return null

oleksiyp · Answer

Should be possible AFAIK

darych · Answer

While debugging when I m in StubbingAwaitingAnswerState kt in answer function `for idx recordedCall in calls withIndex ` throws ConcurrentModificationException Do you know who concurrently may change it I m still trying to make small repro for this but when I m not debugging this repro everything works fine It looks like there is some multithread issue but I can t understand why because I think that everything is running in one thread

darych · Answer

When I go inside StubbingAwaitingAnswerState kt I see the following exception inside calls property `RecordedCall retValue= lt error io mockk MockKException Bad recording sequence Please finalize every block with returns answers just Runs gt retType=Info isRetValueMock=true matcher=class staticmockk SecurityContext getInfo `

darych · Answer

It happens when I go inside returns block in debug mode

oleksiyp · Answer

Debug may be tricky

oleksiyp · Answer

As debugger calls toString

darych · Answer

Yes Unfortunately Sometimes I have empty calls list sometimes it has one elemnt and when I go inside the loop it the `lastCall` is false and debugger shows size = 0

darych · Answer

In my main project I saw that mockk puts null as answer and while debugging static method returns not null value for the call from previous test run even if I have `mockkStatic` function in each test

darych · Answer

< oleksiyp> I m sorry it looks like I was wrong and mockk works perfectly I fonud some issues in my tests

oleksiyp · Answer

no issues fill free to report anything I anyway checking in detail it a lot later