I'm using kotlinx-kover for code coverage in a pro...

# code-coverage

[Landry Norris]

I'm using kotlinx-kover for code coverage in a project. I am using interfaces to maximize code reuse. I'm seeing something strange in one of my projects. I have the following interfaces that add convenient members (LogicGate is another interface)

interface SingleOutput: LogicGate {
    val output: Pin
        get() = outputs.first()
}
interface SingleInput: LogicGate {
    var input
        get() = inputs.first()
        set(value) { inputs[0] = value }
}

I generally implement Input first, then Output, but when I do that, kover shows that the line that says interface SingleOutput: LogicGate is not run. I had to switch the order of imports for one of my classes in order for the line to show as Green in kover's report. Is this expected, or a bug in kover?

[Landry Norris]

Here is an example of how I normally implement the interfaces: class AndGate: TwoInput, SingleOutput . I changed one to class Buffer: SingleOutput, SingleInput , and kover showed the line as green. Changing it back to class Buffer: SingleInput, SingleOutput causes the SingleOutput declaration to be marked red in kover.

[CLOVIS]

Please don't send answers to the channel, it spams everyone.

[CLOVIS]

This is probably worth reporting with a reproduction example. I know a few examples where a structure line may count as uncovered, but nothing related to interfaces.

[Vsevolod Tolstopyatov [JB]]

Output, but when I do that, kover shows that the line that says interface SingleOutput: LogicGate is not run

That’s likely to be a bug in an underlying coverage engine. Would be nice you you could report it with a reproducer to Kover GH

[Landry Norris]

I can try to reproduce this and send a reproducer. From what I remember, it looked like the 'solution' of swapping order worked because it would only count coverage for the first interface.

[Vsevolod Tolstopyatov [JB]]

That’s definitely something fishy; our coverage engine likely to misattribute something.
It would be much appreciated!

[Landry Norris]

This was over a year ago, so no promises this is still an issue. I haven't tried to undo the workaround yet and see if it still happens.