if this type of thing isnt allowed here lmk. Ive b...

# kgraphql

[Mattlangsenkamp]

if this type of thing isnt allowed here lmk.
Ive been working on a side project using kotlin, ktor, and kgraphql.
its a todo app that has more features that most (auth, nested todos, different scopes) and I plan on adding more features down the road, as well as just harden the app in general.
the links are below check it out if you want I would totally love some feedback!
https://www.todotree.me/
https://github.com/MattLangsenkamp/TodoTree
https://github.com/MattLangsenkamp/todotree-react

[jeggy]

You are welcome to share your projects 🙂
This looks great 👍

[jeggy]

If you have had any issues or you think there are places where KGraphQL could be better, you are also welcome to share information about your experience with KGraphQL.

[Mattlangsenkamp]

Only place i see room for approval is with union types not requiring the sealed class workaround other than that i find the dsl extremely intuitive and would use it for a future project for sure

[jeggy]

That sounds great 😃 I have noted the union issue here: https://github.com/aPureBase/KGraphQL/issues/119

[jeggy]

Hi @Mattlangsenkamp
I hope it's okay, but I have added your project to the examples page 🙂
https://kgraphql.io/Examples/

[Mattlangsenkamp]

yes this is more than ok, glad I could contribute!