Is there a better way to delay the `AnimatedVisibi...

# compose

[Vsevolod Kaganovych]

Is there a better way to delay the AnimatedVisibility execution? Code in thread.

[Vsevolod Kaganovych]

var state by remember {
            mutableStateOf(false)
        }

LaunchedEffect(Unit) {
            delay(500)
            state = true
        }

AnimatedVisibility(
            visible = state,
            enter = slideInHorizontally(
                initialOffsetX = {
                    -it
                }
            )
        )

this one does work

[Vsevolod Kaganovych]

AnimatedVisibility(
            visible = true,
            enter = slideInHorizontally(
                initialOffsetX = {
                    -it
                },
                animationSpec = tween(durationMillis = 2000, delayMillis = 1000)
            )
        )

this one doesn't

[Csaba Szugyiczki]

AnimatedVisibility is animating state changes only. When you pass true as an initial parameter to it it is not animating anything. You need to pass false to visible first and then change the visibility to true in order to see an animation

[Csaba Szugyiczki]

but you can create your own animation that is started once when your Composable enters the composition

[Vsevolod Kaganovych]

Got it, thanks a lot.

[Doris Liu]

You could also use a MutableTransitionState with AnimatedVisibility to create an animation that has a different target state than initial state:

AnimatedVisibility(
            visibleState = remember { MutableTransitionState(false).apply { targetState = true } },
            enter = slideInHorizontally(
                initialOffsetX = {
                    -it
                },
                animationSpec = tween(durationMillis = 2000, delayMillis = 1000)
            )
        ) { ... }

[Vsevolod Kaganovych]

So when we set targetState to another value, does it trigger the recomposition of animation? This is the same as mutableStateOf(), but for the animation particularly.
Just trying to understand how it works.

[Csaba Szugyiczki]

Just look into the implementation of AnimatedVisibility. But in short, yes it does trigger the animation that you define, when the value of the visible parameter is changed. It “remembers” the current state, and if in the next recomposition you provide a different value it starts the “show” or “hide” animation

[Doris Liu]

So when we set targetState to another value, does it trigger the recomposition of animation?

Yes. targetState in MutableTransitionState is backed by a mutable state: https://cs.android.com/androidx/platform/frameworks/support/+/androidx-main:compose/[…]in/kotlin/androidx/compose/animation/core/Transition.kt;l=114
So when targetState changes, recomposition gets triggered and so do animations. MutableTransitionState allows you to define a different initial state than target state, which will run the animation immediately after the animation (e.g. Transition, AnimatedVisibility) that reads MutableTransitionState is composed for the first time.