Hello folks, in case i have a function which check...

# naming

[George]

Hello folks, in case i have a function which checks for a precondition based on authorization access should i postfix it with orThrow or it's ok to omit it? For example:

private val CspAccount.retrieveAuthenticatedDevice: CspDevice
    get() = this.authenticatedDevice.getOrElse {
        throw WebApplicationException(
            "Authenticated device for account: ${this.number} was not found",
            Response.Status.UNAUTHORIZED
        )
    }

It would be better if i renamed it to getAutheticatedDeviceOrThrow()? Thanks in advance for any answers !

[mbonnin]

Maybe a val? account.authenticatedDeviceOrThrow

[Starr]

definitely a function -- vals shouldn't throw

[Giorgos Makris]

i would add the orThrow part as it is. If you wanted to omit it i would expect the return type to be Result<CspDevice>

[Klitos Kyriacou]

I would go with consistency with existing libraries. For example kotlin has a Map.getValue() - it's not getValueOrThrow. I would therefore not add OrThrow.

[Starr]

the getValue is for consistency with Java, or for compatibility with delegates

[Klitos Kyriacou]

I was referring specifically to the overload fun <K, V> Map<K, V>.getValue(key: K): V - this is unrelated to delegates, and I don't see any consistency with Java, since the Java Map interface doesn't have a "get" that throws.