Why do we have three different over load of `Anima...

# compose

[zoha131]

Why do we have three different over load of AnimatedVisibility . More specifically why do we have RowScope and ColumnScope version of implementations? Isn’t without scope one is enough?

I think I have seen this pattern for couple of other Composables. My curious minds wants to the reason behind it. 🧐

[zoha131]

I realize this pattern because sometimes AS fails to import the right one. Also if I import the ColumnScope one then I can’t use any other version.

[Jan Bína]

It's explained right in its javadoc:

When the [AnimatedVisibility] composable is put in a [Row] or a [Column], the default enter and exit transitions are tailored to that particular container.

[zoha131]

@Jan Bína my qs is why three different version? why not single one without any scope.

[Zach Klippenstein (he/him) [MOD]]

Because without the separately scoped overloads “the default enter and exit transitions are tailored to that particular container” would not be possible