Is there a modifier that does something like `WRAP CONTENT`

Question

Adam Powell · Answer

That s generally the default behavior what are you trying to do more specifically

Adam Powell · Answer

compose layouts measure based on constraints provided by the parent that contain min max for width height

Adam Powell · Answer

there s a `LayoutWidth Fill` and matching for `Height` and `Size` to set min = max for those constraints and continue measurement but most layouts try to size conservatively by default for a very `WRAP CONTENT` like behavior

Ian Warwick · Answer

nice thanks < Adam Powell> seems I was applying `Modifer None` to a `Card` inside a popup and it was then applying more space By removing the modifer override of `Modifer None` it wraps the items nicely screenie with modifier

Ian Warwick · Answer

commented out modifier

Adam Powell · Answer

`Modifier None` is just an empty sentinel it s used as the default parameter value for modifiers everywhere I m willing to bet something else was at play there

Adam Powell · Answer

What was the code calling this passing as the modifier

Adam Powell · Answer

What s the `Container` around the `Card` there for

Adam Powell · Answer

generally when you accept a modifier you want to pass it to the root of the subtree that your composable is emitting

Ian Warwick · Answer

yes sorry you are right there is much more going on here caller passing in modifiers I probably put the container there without thinking about wether it was correct slightly smiling face will check it through thanks

Adam Powell · Answer

at least it was easy to track down where the weird behavior was coming from

Adam Powell · Answer

I think all of the stock modifiers should have pretty legible useful `toString`s so just `println` it or take a look at one in the debugger at a breakpoint and you should be able to see what s up pretty quickly

Adam Powell · Answer

once we get this integrated with the layout inspector there should be a nice visual display of such things

Ian Warwick · Answer

yeh for some reason I explicitly added a `LayoutHeight Constrain` to fix something else and forgot about it laughing anyway wow its gone midnight and super tired better leave this till morning thanks for all the super work Its very awesome to work with very happy where its going and nice one about the string info thumbsup