I'm looking at updating a project from ktlint 1.10...

# ktlint

[Jonathan Lennox]

I'm looking at updating a project from ktlint 1.10.2 to 1.13.1, and I see that it wants to change an indentation:

val snapshot: Snapshot
         get() {
             val bucketCounts = Array(thresholdCounts.size) {
-                i ->
+                    i ->
                 Pair(Pair(thresholds[i], thresholds[i + 1]), thresholdCounts[i].sum())
             }

Why is it better to have the variable indented like that? It seems odd to me.

[Jonathan Lennox]

Or is it better to have the variable on the previous line after the curly, and if so, why doesn't ktlint enforce/do that?

[jlleitschuh]

Ktlint attempts to follow the default Kotlin formatting that IJ outputs. I don't know if this group actually has an opinion TBH

[Jonathan Lennox]

Aha...is there a separate channel for where the IntelliJ style is discussed/decided?

[jlleitschuh]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[jlleitschuh]

I actually don't know, @tapchicoma ^^

[Jonathan Lennox]

(I can indeed confirm that this what IntelliJ does.)

[tapchicoma]

Don't know as well. Best way would be open a new issue in ktlint project

[bbaldino]

@Jonathan Lennox i think i’ve seen this before too, and i believe this is referred to as a “continuation indent”, and it’s usually done as one indent past what the code indentation would be at that level (in some places i think it looks ok, like overflowing function arguments, but here it’s pretty annoying)

[bbaldino]

but there might be a continuation indent default you could set/override in editorconfig

[ephemient]

having { i -> on the same line is definitely the more common style