With Bintray sunsetting I'm going to move KVision ...
# kvision
r
With Bintray sunsetting I'm going to move KVision to Maven Central. It's probably a good moment to consider renaming maven group name from "pl.treksoft" to "io.kvision". What do you think?
5
b
yes please!
r
Do you think it would be a breaking change? 🙂 I don't want KVision 4.x ...
b
Well, i think repoMigraion is already breaking enough. And changing
import pl.treksoft.*
to
import io.kvision
can be done via IDE in one go.
You won't get another chance like this 😄
Plus I see no harm in kvision 4.*.
r
Hmm ... thinking this way Bootstrap 5 will come with KVision 5 😉
b
Right! Yeah, I think it'd make sense to skip v4 even and just sync kvision major with bootstrap
Or if bootstrap5 will not come out before jcenter dies, use v4 as a placeholder for repo migration
r
Perhaps you are right, I will go with 1.4.30 and IR being default as well, so 4.x is probably justified.
I think it will take some time to support BS 5 after it will be released.
👍 1
So right now it's a long way till KVision 5 😉
And publishing to Maven Central is a lot more complicated than Bintray. Apparently I need to watch a dozen of videos (!) to learn this! 😬
b
I wish there'd be a guide somewhere on how to publish MPP lib to central...
r
redux-kotlin is published to central, at least I can take a look at the configuration
j
If you want to rename, you should rename now. But I would really consider a new major version number. Changing packages in a minor release it at least "surprising"