gradle started complaining about this line: ```imp...

# refreshversions

[Nikky]

gradle started complaining about this line:

implementation(Testing.junit.api)

e: ...\build.gradle.kts:90:46: Function invocation 'api(...)' expected

i am using gradle 7.3.3 (7.3 also has this behaviour)

[jmfayard]

I think it should be

implementation(Testing.junit.jupiter.api)

https://github.com/jmfayard/refreshVersions/blob/main/plugins/dependencies/src/main/kotlin/dependencies/Testing.kt#L42-L56

[jmfayard]

Apparently there was a breaking change on our side
https://github.com/jmfayard/refreshVersions/commit/649eb781003b995acdd135d184c8b274d93d1762#diff-c7ca5c55bdeede8b46d34[…]bbc5bf805af7a64a6bef0d9ec22

[jmfayard]

yes, that was in refreshVersions 0.30.0

https://github.com/jmfayard/refreshVersions/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#version-0300-2021-12-19

[Nikky]

yeah i think idea had the 0.30.0 thing cached and i was already on 0.40.0

[louiscad]

So, solved?

[Nikky]

yes

[louiscad]

@Nikky Are you using a custom build of refreshVersions?

[Nikky]

no i am using 0.40.0
and i think the issue was that it had the broken api loaded into idea for a moment and that showed me autocompletion, but gradle complained about it..

[louiscad]

Were you using a custom build?

[Nikky]

no?

[louiscad]

It's weird, refreshVersions should have automatically replaced the old dependency notation

[Nikky]

i'd prefer if it did not,
deprecation notices with replacement options are better

and the code was fine, but idea marked it in red.. so i looked into it and replaced it with what i thought was correct.. but turned out to be old api

[louiscad]

It's unmaintainable for me to have to manage the deprecation cycle of so many dependencies, that's why I worked hard on making a reliable replacement mechanism.

I think I understand now, you weren't using that dependency notation in the affected file yet, but after updating refreshVersions, you didn't perform a Gradle sync/reload, and the IDE suggested the old dependency notation because it was what it knew to be true as a result, is that correct?