Adam S
11/24/2022, 8:35 PMafterEach{} hook - should it?
I thought that withData() would register a test case for each data element, and so afterEach{} would be triggered by the end of each withData(...) {} blockAdam S
11/24/2022, 8:36 PMEmil Kantis
11/24/2022, 8:37 PMAdam S
11/24/2022, 8:37 PMAdam S
11/24/2022, 8:38 PMEmil Kantis
11/24/2022, 8:41 PMAdam S
11/24/2022, 8:42 PMEmil Kantis
11/24/2022, 8:43 PMAdam S
11/24/2022, 8:45 PMAFTER EACH matches. So I don’t think the afterEach {} is triggered, which is strangeEmil Kantis
11/24/2022, 8:45 PM@DirtiesContext(ClassMode.AFTER_EACH_TEST_METHOD)Emil Kantis
11/24/2022, 8:46 PMAdam S
11/24/2022, 8:47 PM@DirtiesContext(classMode = DirtiesContext.ClassMode.AFTER_EACH_TEST_METHOD) works, but it makes the tests too slowAdam S
11/24/2022, 8:47 PMAFTER EACH in the logsEmil Kantis
11/24/2022, 8:47 PMCustomRootSpec is interferingEmil Kantis
11/24/2022, 8:54 PMAdam S
11/24/2022, 8:54 PMsam
11/24/2022, 8:58 PMDavio
11/24/2022, 8:59 PMDavio
11/24/2022, 9:00 PMEmil Kantis
11/24/2022, 9:00 PMDavio
11/24/2022, 9:01 PMAdam S
11/24/2022, 9:02 PMEmil Kantis
11/24/2022, 9:03 PMafterTest, if that works for you.Emil Kantis
11/24/2022, 9:03 PMAdam S
11/24/2022, 9:10 PMafterAny {} seems to workAdam S
11/24/2022, 9:10 PMEmil Kantis
11/24/2022, 9:17 PM