Hey all! What is the recommended approach to "group modules"? For example: I have a root package called feed and two subpackage called list and details - I wanted to have one module per package and include the two in the root one (feed). Right now, looks like you need to create them separated and introduce a "list" grouping them. Is that correct?
operator. This allow to regroup it logically as a list. What you propose is that this groups directly as a Module in fact?
m
Marcello Galhardo
11/02/2021, 11:34 AM
Yes, exactly. Right now Iām using the + operator but each āGradle Moduleā has to expose a list with all their content. And in the end I group all list into a single list (featureModuleCollection)
In my limited understand, allowing a module to āincludeā other module would completely hide from āoutsideā it is a list and the API would motivate people to create smaller modules.
Sometimes I see developers simple putting everything in a single module to avoid creating lists of lists. :-(
a
arnaud.giuliani
11/02/2021, 11:49 AM
I see, like including other moduleās definition and avoid having list of stuff š¤