Yes, correct. I would like to have only `Retention...

# chucker

[Vova Buberenko]

Yes, correct. I would like to have only RetentionPeriod visible.
Because now I can easily do things, like on an attached screenshot below from almost any place with access to context and it works just fine. Ideally, such things shouldn’t be visible to users at all.

So, I am annotating class as Deprecated and creating its copy in internal package, but without enum and with created RetentionPeriod class. Also, I will add a comment with explanation and use … link, so users could see what change is going to happen in future. Is it correct?

If so, it now seems that I should do it in a separate PR instead of trying to do in my current one with visibility fixes.