@sam qq relaying a q from a colleague. do you have a suggestion on how can we register listeners to say checkAll per scope e.g. nested in a context? Right now we've been using explicit function calls / passing various explicit proptestconfig that carries a listener with it. Curious if you have a better idea around that

Not sure I understand the ask. Do you have an example ?

we’ve been doing

test("something") {
    checkAll(
        defaultPropTestConfig().withListeners(beforeAfterListener),
        arbFoo,
        arbBar
    ) { foo, bar ->
       ...
    }
}

fun PropTestConfig.withListeners(vararg listeners: PropTestListener): PropTestConfig = ...

and you'd rather register the listener somewhere global than adding it to the prop test config ?

the ask was if it’s possible to do this (we use funspec)

context("foo") {
    beforeProperty {
       ...
    }
    
    test(...) { 
       etc...
    }
}

the property test library can't rely on special things in the framework, or it would only be usable from kotest ....but I think we could possibly make this work.

yeah, i was looking around the codebase, lifting checkAll above the test or somehow implicitly injecting a container scope to checkAll but might be quite a massive change.. something like this?

ContainerScope.checkAll(...)

I like your syntax of the beforeProperty block

hmm yeah tricky

it's straight forward to have the forAll / checkAlls look for a well known attribute in the coroutine context

thanks!