Omar Mainegra
12/01/2020, 4:03 PMSingleWrapper<String?>
Is there any particular reason to this change? Or workaround to deal with Nullability/Absent of Values?Arkadii Ivanov
12/01/2020, 4:11 PMclass Foo<T>
, then in Swift it will be always nullable type. E.g. fun foo(): Foo<String>
will be nullable in Swift. So we decided to make it explicitly non-null, so it is also non-null in Swift. You have some options: use Maybe, introduce some sort of Optional, introduce your own nullable Wrappers.Omar Mainegra
12/01/2020, 4:12 PM