<@U016VMY2A72> <https://github.com/sksamuel/hoplit...

# hoplite

[sam]

@Jim https://github.com/sksamuel/hoplite/issues/191

[Jim]

That's one scary looking issue up in there 😂

[sam]

lol

[sam]

I added this for me https://github.com/sksamuel/hoplite/issues/190

[Jim]

I assume 191 depends on 190?

[sam]

Yeah I'm updating core now

[Jim]

I think maybe the way forward is to try to do:

hoplite-serializationx as MPP, then once that's done, move all of the hoplite-json code into the former, and somehow make that implementation optional

[sam]

yeah I agree

[Jim]

From what I can tell the json parser does a lot of the work for you in kotlinx-serialization, and I'm not sure I can just get at the guts like you can with jackson

[sam]

the other thing is, as we discussed, in MPP mode you will need to explictly add your parsers

[sam]

So you can just choose to add JimJsonParser

[sam]

but on JVM we'll continue to use service loaders?

[sam]

Alternatively, we can just bump to 2.0, rename hoplite-json to hoplite-jackson

[Jim]

hmmm that's an option too

[sam]

I think going MPP is a big enough change to warrant 2.0

[Jim]

true

[Jim]

ok I'll monitor 190 and once that's done I'll just try to do hoplite-jimwhatever as a proof of concept

[sam]

ok