👋 The Apollo Client Team is looking for product feedback from our community to help shape the future of our Clients. If you have some time and would like to contribute, please complete this survey by

June 17th, 2022.

It should take no longer then

10 minutes

and every response will be used to help us better understand your use of Apollo Client as well as what type of features and functionality you are looking for in the future. Thank you! 🙏

The survey is anonymous and the data will only used for directional product decisions, feature prioritization and the long term planning of our Client roadmaps.

Hmm what are we referring to when we say “Apollo Client”? It appears to be the JS library. Is this what the questions are about? Or does it refer to “apollo-kotlin” in our context?

Haha yeah I worried a bit this wouldn't be clear 😅. We have the same survey for the 3 clients: Kotlin, JS, Swift

I’m just gonna give all the feedback here I hope it’s okay to refer to what the questions say here in public. The question: “If you use caching in our clients, how difficult has it been to implement?” is then followed by: “Let us know what your experience has been enabling caching in our clients.” So I’m not sure if the 0-10 scale under refers to 10 = It was super difficult 0 = It was super easy OR 10 = My experience has been super 0 = My experience has been bad It may be just me though 😅

that's a good point, you know what I'm also confused by it 🙂 I think it's supposed to be 0=easy, 10=difficult, but unclear - I've relayed to our PM who crafted the form. 🙏

What is “If you use local state management in our clients, how difficult has it been to implement?” referring to in our context?

This may be more relevant to the JS client which has specific APIs to access local data. For us it could mean, have you ever wanted to edit the normalized cache, and how did it go 😊 And did you miss any other specific functionality in this area?