Is the normalized cache supported when using Kotlin/JS?

# apollo-kotlin

[John O'Reilly]

Is the normalized cache supported when using Kotlin/JS?

[bod]

I’m afraid not!

Here’s the matrix of Multiplatform.

[John O'Reilly]

ok, thanks

[John O'Reilly]

I was looking to use in https://github.com/joreilly/PeopleInSpace which has Kotlin/JS client.....but can factor out use of normalized cache for that platform (have done something similar for another library)

[bod]

we have this issue open for this - we think it may not be too hard (but that’s often a dangerous statement 😅) since SQLDelight supports JS

[John O'Reilly]

actually, that matrix shows that apollo-normalized-cache is available for JS?

[John O'Reilly]

this is the in memory one I presume?

[bod]

woops sorry yes, that’s correct

[John O'Reilly]

cool, can configure hopefully to use just that then for JS

[John O'Reilly]

Getting following for some reason when building Kotlin/JS (after adding apollo dependencies)....I'll keep digging but just in case it's something you've come across....

java.lang.IllegalStateException: FATAL ERROR: Could not find "io.ktor:ktor-http-cio" in [/Users/joreilly/Library/Application Support/kotlin/daemon]
	at org.jetbrains.kotlin.ir.backend.js.KlibKt$toResolverLogger$1.fatal(klib.kt:117)
	at org.jetbrains.kotlin.library.KotlinLibrarySearchPathResolver.resolve(SearchPathResolver.kt:175)

[John O'Reilly]

This is code that still has ktor dependencies....perhaps running in to some conflicts between versions used

[John O'Reilly]

probably an usual situation to have a project use both apollo and ktor directly.....had thought I'd show both implementation side by side for comparison but might just create separate branch that use apollo

[bod]

👋 Hey did you manage to resolve it in the end?

[John O'Reilly]

I ended up keeping this in separate branch without ktor stuff for now. I'm using Ktor 2.x atm in that project which I think is probably incomaptible.

[bod]

oh indeed that must be it - Apollo is using 1.6.4

[John O'Reilly]

I had to move to 2.x in that project to get combination of dependencies that worked on M1 devices and also supported new k/n memory model

[bod]

Yeah I can imagine. It would be nice for Apollo to depend on the more recent one too - wondering if that would be a big change (I'm supposing not too big). On the other hand this could break people who want to do this too but are still on Ktor 1.x 😄

[John O'Reilly]

2.0 is still in beta right now.....I guess maybe more a potential requirement once it hits stable

[John O'Reilly]

have you guys been looking much yet at using new memory model?

[bod]

Good point!

[bod]

Re: memory model, we haven't looked at it too much, but it's on the roadmap. But yeah I guess waiting for things to be more stable overall 🙂

[clark]

Is it still the case that 2.x would be needed to use the new k/n memory model?

[bod]

Not sure about Ktor but Apollo still doesn’t support the new memory model at this point