Hi! We’re observing some strange behaviour when us...

# apollo-kotlin

[wasyl]

Hi! We’re observing some strange behaviour when using cache_only fetch strategy, namely our Flow with that strategy fails with a network exception. Is it possible that a query with cache_only fetch strategy makes, or triggers (by refetching some previous query), a network call?

[mbonnin]

Since it's a Flow, I'm assuming a watcher is involved somewhere?

[mbonnin]

not that it should really matter, it feels like cache_only should never reach the network but trying to understand

[wasyl]

Yep, it’s watcher.toFlow() somewhere deeper

[wasyl]

Basically we’re making the same query twice: first with Cache_Only strategy, and then with Network_Only . We expect the first one to just wait until the second one fetches data and emit the same thing. However, we’re observing two network requests being made

[mbonnin]

I remember some cases where the fetchStrategy was ignored because the return value was ignored (the API is a bit weird)

[mbonnin]

let me check if I can find the issue

[mbonnin]

Could it be related to https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-android/issues/2430 ?

[mbonnin]

Calling ApolloQueryCall.responseFetcher() returns a new ApolloQueryCall and if the return value isn't used, it's lost forever

[wasyl]

I’m pretty sure we properly chain the calls always, but you did point me to one piece of our code which might be messing with things, let me check that

[wasyl]

It’s most certainly not that 😕 And I just verified that we watch the query with network_only strategy exactly once, and it still makes two network calls 🤔

[mbonnin]

😕

[mbonnin]

Any chance you can share some code or pseudo code?

[wasyl]

We’re working on some repro but without luck 😕

[mbonnin]

Mmmm, could it be another watcher that trigger the network call?

[mbonnin]

When data is normalized, it's hard to keep track of who's listening to what key

[wasyl]

could it be another watcher that trigger the network call?

But then should the network call be returned from the Flow started with cache_only fetch strategy?

it’s hard to keep track of who’s listening to what key

Definitely, we already fixed a bunch of places where we didn’t request normalized cache id for a given type, but only in some queries. This resolved some issues and now we’re pretty sure we’re requesting all `id`s. There is another query which fetches part of the same data that the one that’s failing though

[mbonnin]

But then should the network call be returned from the Flow started with cache_only fetch strategy?

It shouldn't. How do you know the data came from the network ? isFromCache == false ?

[wasyl]

I’m sorry I meant network error

[mbonnin]

Ah right

[mbonnin]

What is the exception you're getting?

[mbonnin]

Maybe we're mapping to a network error for something else? (that wouldn't be great but you never know...)

[wasyl]

Basically we have

query Foo {
  foo { ...fooData }
  bar { ...barData }
}

query Bar {
  bar { ...barData }
}

Foo is started twice: with cache_only and with network_only strategy.
Bar is started once, with cache_and_network .

We observe the Foo/network_only query returning successfully with data, Foo/cache_only fails with network error. We’re investigating which Bar might be an issue now, because we do have something like 5-6 queries being made it seems 😕

[wasyl]

Maybe we’re mapping to a network error for something else?

Unlikely, the exception is clearly a network error, it has cause with some OkHttp type with timeout specified etc.

[mbonnin]

Is Foo/network_only a watcher as well or is it one-shot?

[mbonnin]

There's this issue about multiple watchers calling each other https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-android/issues/2226. But I have never been able to reproduce

[wasyl]

Is Foo/network_only a watcher as well or is it one-shot?

It’s a watcher but we terminate it immediately with first()

[mbonnin]

So you're basically doing this:

apolloClient.query(FooQuery()).responseFetcher(ApolloResponseFetchers.CACHE_ONLY).watcher().toFlow().collect {
  println(it.data)
}

And this throws a ApolloNetworkException?

[mbonnin]

That's weird, the CACHE_ONLY stuff is pretty explicit about bypassing the network

[wasyl]

Yep, exactly. The flows are pretty much straightforward, we do have some mappers and stuff along the way but there’s no real chance we’d do something weird

[mbonnin]

It would still be interesting to see that exception stacktrace

[mbonnin]

If everything goes well, there shouldn't be any sign of ApolloServerInterceptor there

[wasyl]

We just isolated the change that triggers this issue, and it’s fetching a completely unrelated query, with CACHE_FIRST strategy. And it’s a query for extremely simple object, no ids no nothing

[wasyl]

Just an update, this is part of the stack trace that’s particularly suspicious:

at com.apollographql.apollo.internal.RealApolloQueryWatcher.refetch(RealApolloQueryWatcher.java:115)
at com.apollographql.apollo.internal.RealApolloQueryWatcher$1.onCacheRecordsChanged(RealApolloQueryWatcher.java:40)
at com.apollographql.apollo.internal.RealApolloStore.publish(RealApolloStore.java:117)
at com.apollographql.apollo.internal.interceptor.ApolloCacheInterceptor$7.run(ApolloCacheInterceptor.java:218)
at com.apollographql.apollo.internal.interceptor.ApolloCacheInterceptor.publishCacheKeys(ApolloCacheInterceptor.java:215)
at com.apollographql.apollo.internal.interceptor.ApolloCacheInterceptor.cacheResponseAndPublishSynchronously(ApolloCacheInterceptor.java:170)
at com.apollographql.apollo.internal.interceptor.ApolloCacheInterceptor.cacheResponseAndPublish(ApolloCacheInterceptor.java:159)

specifically the chain: cacheResponseAndPublishSynchronously -> onCacheRecordsChanged -> refetch

[mbonnin]

Sorry for the late response. Good catch, looks like the default reftechResponseFetcher is CACHE_FIRST : https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-android/blob/3e122b4ff44fff3109911dd24177a[…]a/com/apollographql/apollo/internal/RealApolloQueryWatcher.java

[mbonnin]

So maybe something like below would do:

apolloClient.query(FooQuery())
  .responseFetcher(ApolloResponseFetchers.CACHE_ONLY)
  .watcher()
  .refetchResponseFetcher(ApolloResponseFetchers.CACHE_ONLY)
  .toFlow()
  .collect {}

[mbonnin]

I would have expected the default refetchResponseFetcher to be the same as responseFetcher but maybe there's a reason why it's not the case

[wasyl]

Will check it out

[wasyl]

If anyone stumbles on this thread in the future: it turned out that we were observing two separate issues:
• https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-android/pull/2795 — query watchers would always use CACHE_FIRST refetch strategy, even if the query was specified as CACHE_ONLY (so a cache_only queries would still make a network call on a cache miss)
• https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-android/issues/2798 — where queries that didn’t yet receive any response (CACHE_ONLY are the easiest ones) would trigger a refetch even when a completely unrelated query populated the normalized cache
Many thanks to Martin for taking the time to figure this out! 🙂