hi folks! I just noticed something about the KUG m...

# docs-revamped

[Piotr Krzemiński]

hi folks! I just noticed something about the KUG map: with this change, we don't require position for KUGs because the virtual user group doesn't have one. But then there's no mechanism to ensure that other physical user groups have them, see last change which added two UGs without position.
My idea for improvement: restore position being mandatory, but add a condition for the virtual KUG that it's not placed on the map. VKUG could have some dummy position, like (0.0, 0.0). WDYT?

[Piotr Krzemiński]

CC @Alina Dolgikh [JB]

[Piotr Krzemiński]

I created KT-49574: New user groups are absent on the map for the sake of proper tracking

[Alina Dolgikh [JB]]

Hi Piotr. I see the issue.

My idea for improvement: restore position being mandatory, but add a condition for the virtual KUG that it’s not placed on the map. VKUG could have some dummy position, like (0.0, 0.0). WDYT?

sounds good to me. WDYT @Nikolay Pachkov?

[Nikolay Pachkov]

Hi Piotr! That's a good idea, thanks a lot!