eygraber
05/15/2022, 6:27 AMexpect fun test() and 1 target, which already has a fun test() {} (and doesn't have the actual keyword), is that supposed to work, or does actual need to be specified?Anton Lakotka [JB]
05/15/2022, 8:04 AMexpect fun to another package or different name, and then create its actual by re-using existing fun. If it is too boilerplate-ish and you are okay with lowering compiler safety, then you can declare just expect and suppress warning/error if there is any.eygraber
05/15/2022, 2:59 PMexpect fun test(foo: Bar) and fun test(foo: Bar) I did get a warning