Technically it can work, although it is not recommended (at least at this moment). Consider moving
expect fun
to another package or different name, and then create its actual by re-using existing fun. If it is too boilerplate-ish and you are okay with lowering compiler safety, then you can declare just expect and suppress warning/error if there is any.
e
eygraber
05/15/2022, 2:59 PM
Ok I wasn't sure, because I wasn't getting any errors or warnings.
However when I changed it to