Made this function, but I feel like the name (and ...

# naming

[Sam Stone]

Made this function, but I feel like the name (and possibly the signature) can be improved. I use this alot (e.g. foos.find { it.id == id }) so this is nice sugar for me (used like foos.findBy(id) { it.id }):

inline fun <T, R> Iterable<T>.findBy(key: R, selector: (T) -> R): T? = find { selector(it) == key }

Maybe rename to just find? findIn?

[Joffrey]

Why do you find this custom function better? It saves 0 characters, you still have to have both the property access and the value, and it's one more thing the reader will have to figure out (as opposed to stdlib functions).