is there already a ticket about negating infix cal...

# language-proposals

[elect]

is there already a ticket about negating infix calls at the function name rather than at the receiver?
ie, NavInput._DpadLeft !_isTest readMode

[Sam]

https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/KT-5351

[elect]

thanks

[Davio]

Obviously it is up to library maintainers whether to want to offer the negated methods themselves. Infix is mainly used for enhanced readability and a isNot b is in my opinion more readable than a !is b

[Davio]

You could always still do !a.is(b) without the infix notation