A modern programming language that makes developers happier.

kotlinlang

Is it intended behavior that
`data class @JvmRecord SomeClass(@JvmField val field: String)`
generates bytecode for a class that is a record, but violates the record assuption of having a method named `field()` ?

This is just how Java records work: there is a public method with the same field name. The jvmfield annotation has no effect. 

It seems that if you try reflection to get that method you get a null, which lead to a bug for me (graalvm native compile)