Looking for feedback on <https://github.com/kotest...

# kotest-contributors

[Emil Kantis]

Looking for feedback on https://github.com/kotest/kotest-intellij-plugin/pull/310

[Oliver.O]

I'm generally not a template user and a light user of line auto-completion, but I could use my imagination, so let's try:
• For me, it would be FunSpec only, as I like it explicit. I also like to keep distraction to a minimum, which would include multiple ways of doing the same thing.
• fspec is ambiguous, so if you'd like to add more, it could be fuspec, frspec and fespec.

[Emil Kantis]

I did some digging on Github to evaluate how popular the different spec styles are.. Here's the findings:


| Spec style | Hits |
| -------------- | ---- |
| FunSpec | 5.9k |
| DescribeSpec | 4k |
| ShouldSpec | 1.2k |
| StringSpec | 4.6k |
| FreeSpec | 2k |
| WordSpec | 1.2k |
| BehaviorSpec | 2.7k |
| FeatureSpec | 298 |
| ExpectSpec | 133 |
| AnnotationSpec | 920 |


I think we could consider removing FeatureSpec and ExpectSpec given the above. It would also be nice to harmonize FreeSpec, StringSpec and WordSpec into a single style.

[Emil Kantis]

Depending on what name we land on for the string-based specs, we might fspec might become unambiguous.. I'd like to keep it as fspec while "stealth launching" the live templates if no one strongly objects.